Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (1):25-51 (2013)
|Abstract||In this paper, I argue that internalism about moral judgments and motivation faces a dilemma. On the one hand, a strong version of internalism is able to explain our conception of the connection between moral language and motivation, but fails to account for the notion that people who suffer from certain mental conditions need not be accordingly motivated. On the other hand, a weaker form of internalism avoids this difficulty, but fails to explain the mentioned conception concerning moral language and motivation. Moreover, I argue that externalism in conjunction with a pragmatic claim which employs Grice’s concept of generalized conversational implicature is able to account for both these conceptions and that it consequently avoids the internalist dilemma. Thus, there is reason to think that this view is preferable to internalism.|
|Keywords||internalism externalism rationalism generalized conversational implicautre|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Caj Strandberg (2013). An Internalist Dilemma—and an Externalist Solution. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (1):25-51.
Caj Strandberg (2011). The Pragmatics of Moral Motivation. Journal of Ethics 15 (4):341-369.
Prakash Mondal (2011). Can Internalism and Externalism Be Reconciled in a Biological Epistemology of Language? Biosemiotics.
Robert Lockie (1998). What's Wrong with Moral Internalism. Ratio 11 (1):14–36.
Caj Strandberg & Fredrik Björklund (forthcoming). Is Moral Internalism Supported by Folk Intuitions? Philosophical Psychology:1-17.
David J. Alexander (2012). Weak Inferential Internalism is Indistinguishable From Externalism – A Reply to Rhoda. Journal of Philosophical Research 37:387-394.
Maciej Witek (2003). Wittgenstein and the Internalism-Externalism Dilemma. In W. Löffler & P. Weingartner (eds.), Knowledge and Belief. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
Duncan Pritchard & Jesper Kallestrup (2004). An Argument for the Inconsistency of Content Externalism and Epistemic Internalism. Philosophia 31 (3-4):345-354.
Daniel Cohnitz & Jussi Haukioja (2012). Meta-Externalism Vs Meta-Internalism in the Study of Reference. Australasian Journal of Philosophy (iFirst):1-26.
David J. Alexander (2012). Weak Inferential Internalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 37:357-377.
Sven Bernecker (2006). Prospects for Epistemic Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 130 (1):81-104.
B. J. C. Madison (2009). On the Compatibility of Epistemic Internalism and Content Externalism. Acta Analytica 24 (3):173-183.
Caj Strandberg (2012). Expressivism and Dispositional Desires. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1):81-91.
Elinor Mason (2008). An Argument Against Motivational Internalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1part2):135-156.
Ragnar Francén (2010). Moral Motivation Pluralism. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):117-148.
Added to index2010-11-12
Total downloads46 ( #23,836 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,326 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?