Philosophical Studies 154 (3):325-348 (2011)
|Abstract||Some philosophers think that normative properties are identical to descriptive properties. In this paper, I argue that this entails that it is possible to say which descriptive properties normative properties are identical to. I argue that Frank Jackson’s argument to show that this is possible fails, and that the objections to this argument show that it is impossible to say which descriptive properties normative properties are identical to. I conclude that normative properties are not identical to descriptive properties. I then show that if we combine this conclusion with the conclusion of a different argument that Jackson has given to show that there are no irreducibly normative properties, it follows that there are no normative properties at all.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Warren Shrader (forthcoming). Shoemaker on Emergence. Philosophical Studies.
Tom McClelland (2012). In Defence of Kantian Humility. Thought 1 (1):62-70.
John Collier (2008). A Dynamical Account of Emergence. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 15 (3-4):75-86.
Rafael De Clercq (2008). The Structure of Aesthetic Properties. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):894-909.
Edward Wilson Averill (1990). Are Physical Properties Dispositions? Philosophy of Science 57 (1):118-132.
ByBrad Majors (2005). Moral Discourse and Descriptive Properties. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):475–494.
Gilead Bar-Elli (2002). Ideal Performance. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):223-242.
Bart Streumer (2008). Are There Irreducibly Normative Properties? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):537-561.
Added to index2009-07-08
Total downloads43 ( #26,205 of 549,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,956 of 549,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?