David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (3):393-393 (1973)
Professor sard states that russell's response to ronald searle rests on a fallacy. Russell states that he dreamt of one thing not in heaven or earth, While searle says that there are more things in heaven than russell dreamt of. Stroll argues that sard's interpretation of the phrase "there are more things in heaven than are dreamed of" is mistaken. Russell interprets this to mean that taking a to be the set of all things capable of being dreamed of in heaven or earth, It is possible to dream of another thing--The class of all those classes that are not members of themselves--Which does not exist in a
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marcelo Dascal (2004). Alter et etiam: Rejoinder to Schepers. The Leibniz Review 14:137-151.
Avrum Stroll (1955). Believing the Meaningless: A Reply to Mr. Mellor. Analysis 16 (2):45 - 48.
Thomas Donaldson (1990). Social Contracts and Corporations: A Reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.
Herbert A. Simon (1983). I. Mathematical Modeling of Election Predictions: Final Reply to Professor Aubert. Inquiry 26 (2):231 – 232.
Henry Leonard (1961). A Reply to Professor Wheatley's Note on Professor Leonard's Analysis of Interrogatives, Etc. Philosophy of Science 28 (January):55-64.
Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.
Arthur Sard (1973). Russell, Searle, and Hamlet. Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (3):392-392.
Phillip Cole (2002). Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne. Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #391,263 of 1,938,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #449,299 of 1,938,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?