Conventionalism and the indeterminacy of translation

Synthese 19 (1-2):82 - 96 (1968)
Quine's arguments for the indeterminacy of translation demonstrate the existence and help to explain the rationale of restraints upon what we can say and understand. In particular they show that there are logical truths to which there are no intelligible alternatives. Thus the standard view that the truths of logic and mathematics differ from "synthetic" statements in being true solely by virtue of linguistic convention--Which requires for its plausibility the existence of intelligible alternatives to our present logical truth--Is opposed directly, And not by the espousal of "a more thorough pragmatism". This raises problems about possibility and conceptual novelty
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,029
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Bernulf Kanitscheider (1973). Geochronometrie Und Geometrodynamik. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 4 (2):261-302.
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

35 ( #57,765 of 1,410,455 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,455 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.