Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 19 (1-2):82 - 96 (1968)
|Abstract||Quine's arguments for the indeterminacy of translation demonstrate the existence and help to explain the rationale of restraints upon what we can say and understand. In particular they show that there are logical truths to which there are no intelligible alternatives. Thus the standard view that the truths of logic and mathematics differ from "synthetic" statements in being true solely by virtue of linguistic convention--Which requires for its plausibility the existence of intelligible alternatives to our present logical truth--Is opposed directly, And not by the espousal of "a more thorough pragmatism". This raises problems about possibility and conceptual novelty|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip L. Peterson (1984). Semantic Indeterminacy and Scientific Underdetermination. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):464-487.
Edward F. Becker (2012). The Themes of Quine's Philosophy: Meaning, Reference, and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Yemima Ben-menahem (2005). Black, White and Gray: Quine on Convention. Synthese 146 (3):245 - 282.
Günter Abel (1994). Indeterminacy and Interpretation. Inquiry 37 (4):403 – 419.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):395-413.
Howard Darmstadter (1974). Indeterminacy of Translation and Indeterminacy of Belief. Philosophical Studies 26 (3-4):229 - 237.
Steven I. Miller & Marcel Fredericks (1991). Some Notes on the Nature of Methodological Indeterminacy. Synthese 88 (3):359 - 378.
Jay F. Rosenberg (1967). Synonymy and the Epistemology of Linguistics. Inquiry 10 (1-4):405-420.
Roy Sorensen (1996). The Metaphysics of Words. Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):193 - 214.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,656 of 754,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 754,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?