Can Hooker's rule-consequentialist principle justify Ross's prima facie duties?

Mind 106 (424):751-758 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Good in the Right. [REVIEW]Vojko Strahovnik - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):583-589.
Prima facie and seeming duties.Michael Morreau - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):47 - 71.
A Partial Application Procedure for Ross’s Ethical Theory.B. C. Postow - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:239-248.
Ross and prima facie duties.John Atwell - 1978 - Ethics 88 (3):240-249.
On Audi's Marriage of Ross and Kant.Thomas Hurka - 2007 - In Mark Timmons, John Greco & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi. Oxford University Press. pp. 64-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
301 (#60,766)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Stratton-Lake
University of Reading

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references