Inquiry 28 (1-4):177 – 194 (1985)
|Abstract||In the philosophical and psychological literature of the twentieth century, the concept of a surface plays a pervasive and important role, mostly in connection with theories of perception. The author argues that the concept has interesting logical and ontological uses as well. The focus of the paper is on the question of whether surfaces are real ingredients in the world, and the argument of the paper is that, under certain construals, they are|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth R. Westphal (1998). Hegel and Hume on Perception and Concept-Empiricism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1):99-123.
George G. Brenkert (2009). Google, Human Rights, and Moral Compromise. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):453 - 478.
Nikolay Milkov (2006). Mesocosmological Descriptions: An Essay in the Extensional Ontology of History. Essays in Philosophy 7 (2):1-17.
Michael L. Peterson & G. Rhodes (eds.) (2003). Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355). Oxford University Press.
Shimon Edelman, Viewpoint Generalization in Face Recognition: The Role of Category-Speci C Processes.
Mark Rowlands (2006). The Normativity of Action. Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):401-416.
David Morris (2007). Faces and the Invisible of the Visible: Toward an Animal Ontology. Phaenex 2 (2):124-169.
Avrum Stroll (1986). The Role of Surfaces in an Ecological Theory of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (March):437-453.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads12 ( #101,164 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?