I. Galileo and the scientific revolution
Inquiry 18 (3):345 – 353 (1975)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMargaret J. Osler (ed.) (2000). Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1976). Galileo and the Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2).
J. Groot (2000). Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Steffen Ducheyne (2006). Galileo's Interventionist Notion of "Cause&Quot. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (3):443-464.
Alexandre Koyre (1943). Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. Philosophical Review 52 (4):333-348.
Daniel Garber (2004). On the Frontlines of the Scientific Revolution: How Mersenne Learned to Love Galileo. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):135-163.
Per Strømholm (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345 – 353.
Per Str⊘Mholm (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345-353.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-02-04Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
