I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution
Inquiry 18 (3):345-353 (1975)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPer Str (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345 – 353.
Per Strømholm (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345 – 353.
Alexandre Koyre (1943). Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. Philosophical Review 52 (4):333-348.
Daniel Garber (2004). On the Frontlines of the Scientific Revolution: How Mersenne Learned to Love Galileo. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):135-163.
Steffen Ducheyne (2006). Galileo's Interventionist Notion of "Cause&Quot. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (3):443-464.
James Franklin (2000). Diagrammatic Reasoning and Modelling in the Imagination: The Secret Weapons of the Scientific Revolution. In Guy Freeland & Anthony Corones (eds.), 1543 and All That: Image and Word, Change and Continuity in the Proto-Scientific Revolution. Kluwer.
J. Groot (2000). Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Gregory W. Dawes (2002). Could There Be Another Galileo Case? Journal of Religion and Society 4.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2).
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1976). Galileo and the Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Margaret J. Osler (ed.) (2000). Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Gunnar Andersson (1991). The Tower Experiment and the Copernican Revolution. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):143 – 152.
F. A. Muller (2011). Reflections on the Revolution at Stanford. Synthese 183 (1):87-114.
Peter Slezak (2011). Review of Maurice A. Finocchiaro: Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. [REVIEW] Science and Education 20 (1):71-81.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-10-19Total downloads2 ( #232,316 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
