In vivo interpretation of in vitro effect studies with a detailed analysis of the method of in vitro transcription in isolated cell nuclei
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 44 (1):1-21 (1996)
In vitro experimental approaches are of central importance to contemporary molecular and cellular biology and toxicology. However, the scientific value or impact of in vitro results depends on their relevance in vivo. In vitro effect studies address inobservable in vivo phenomena through experiments on analogous in vitro phenomena. We present a theoretical basis developed to evaluate the in vivo relevance of in vitro effect studies. As a case study, the procedure for measuring specific gene transcription in isolated cell nuclei (nuclear run-off method) is analyzed It is concluded that current evidence fails to justify in vivo interpretations of nuclear run-off experiments within the framework of theoretical models of transcription, implying that quantitative in vivo interpretations are unwarranted. Qualitative interpretations of nuclear run-off experiments may be justified by inferring the best explanation, especially when significant in vitro effects follow in vivo perturbations.Elements of a general theory are proposed. It is concluded that quantitative in vivo interpretations are warranted primarily in biochemical quantitation of biomolecules, while studies on biological function should be interpreted qualitatively in terms of causal explanations. Inferences to the best explanations are strengthened through additional evidence and the creation of experimental differences (effects).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ian Hacking (1992). The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press 29--64.
Imre Lakatos (1970). Falsificationism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs' in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave. In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press
Citations of this work BETA
Dominique Chu, Roger Strand & Ragnar Fjelland (2003). Theories of Complexity. Complexity 8 (3):19-30.
Similar books and articles
B. Raïs, C. Chassagnole & J. -P. Mazat (1995). Control of Threonine Pathway in E. Coli. Application to Biotechnologies. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (4):285-297.
Roger Strand (1999). Towards a Useful Philosophy of Biochemistry: Sketches and Examples. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 1 (3):269-292.
H. J. J. Leenen (1986). The Legal Status of the Embryo in Vivo and in Vitro: Research on and the Medical Treatment of Embryos. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 14 (3-4):129-132.
Imre Kilián (2009). Ecovillages: In Vitro Sustainability. World Futures 65 (5):365-371.
Karen Dawson (1988). Segmentation and a Oral Status in Vivo and in Vitro: A Scientific Perspective. Bioethics 2 (1):1–14.
Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (2006). Scientific Theories as Intervening Representations. Theoria 55 (1):21 - 38.
H. Landecker (2002). New Times for Biology: Nerve Cultures and the Advent of Cellular Life in Vitro. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):667-694.
Stephen S. Hanson (2006). “More on Respect for Embryos and Potentiality: Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for in Vitro Embryos?”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
Claus Jacob (2002). Philosophy and Biochemistry: Research at the Interface Between Chemistry and Biology. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2):97-125.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #227,992 of 1,935,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,953 of 1,935,154 )
How can I increase my downloads?