David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 8 (3):165 – 190 (1998)
The most defensible justifications of war in the European intellectual tradition hold that war is instrumentally necessary for the maintenance of peace and order. An investigation of Ancient Chinese philosophical attitudes towards war calls this assumption into question. The closest parallel to an instrumental concept of war is found in the Legalist school, but historical experience in China has rejected this. The Confucian school, especially Mencius and Xunxi, insists that war is not instrumental in creating social order, but derives from the prior establishing of cultural and political authority, and thus must be punitive in nature. Even the use of “punitive expeditions” is not instrumental, but rather demonstrative or performative in nature, for if coercive methods are necessary, the authority to use them is arguably absent. War for the Chinese, then, is not justified by the necessity for creating public order, but is in itself a sign of the failure to achieve such an order. This contrasts sharply with the views of the dominant Western thinkers on war, such as Michael Walzer, whose positions insist upon the instrumental necessity of armed force, even to the point of absurdity. The ancient Chinese position suggests that this necessity may be ungrounded.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Hobbes (2007/2006). Leviathan. In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub.
D. C. Lau (ed.) (2000). Confucius: The Analects. Columbia University Press.
David L. Hall & Roger T. Ames (1991). Thinking Through Confucius. Philosophy East and West 41 (2):241-254.
Robert L. Holmes (1994). [Book Review] on War and Morality. [REVIEW] Social Theory and Practice 20 (2):171-191.
Niccolò Machiavelli (1970). The Discourses. [Harmondsworth, Eng.]Penguin Books.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2010). Just War Theory, Afghanistan, and Walzer. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):1-7.
Fuchuan Yao (2011). War and Confucianism. Asian Philosophy 21 (2):213 - 226.
Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) (2011). War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present. Routledge.
Brian Orend, War. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nadine Godehardt, The Chinese Meaning of Just War and its Impact on the Foreign Policy of the People's Republic of China.
Gaoshan Zuo (2007). Just War and Justice of War: Reflections on Ethics of War. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):280-290.
Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) (2011). Defining War for the 21st Century. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
D. A. Bell (2009). War, Peace, and China's Soft Power: A Confucian Approach. Diogenes 56 (1):26-40.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads17 ( #160,237 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?