Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (4):417 – 439 (2006)
|Abstract||We argue that while presidential candidates have the right to medical privacy, the public nature and importance of the presidency generates a moral requirement that candidates waive those rights in certain circumstances. Specifically, candidates are required to disclose information about medical conditions that are likely to seriously undermine their ability to fulfill what we call the "core functions" of the office of the presidency. This requirement exists because (1) people have the right to be governed only with their consent, (2) people's consent is meaningful only when they have access to information necessary for making informed voting decisions, (3) such information is necessary for making informed voting decisions, and (4) there are no countervailing reasons sufficiently strong to override this right. We also investigate alternative mechanisms for legally encouraging or requiring disclosure. Protecting the public's right to this information is of particular importance because of the documented history of deception and secrecy regarding the health of presidents and presidential candidates.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jason W. Patton (2000). Protecting Privacy in Public? Surveillance Technologies and the Value of Public Places. Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):181-187.
Wendell Cochran (1996). Computers, Privacy, and Journalists: A Suggested Code of Information Practices. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (4):210 – 222.
Bruce Garrison & Sigman Splichal (1994). Reporting on Private Affairs of Candidates: A Study of Newspaper Practices. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (3):169 – 183.
Atsushi Asai, Motoki Ohnishi, Etsuyo Nishigaki, Miho Sekimoto, Shunichi Fukuhara & Tsuguya Fukui (2002). Attitudes of the Japanese Public and Doctors Towards Use of Archived Information and Samples Without Informed Consent: Preliminary Findings Based on Focus Group Interviews. BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-10.
Judith Wagner DeCew (1999). Alternatives for Protecting Privacy While Respecting Patient Care and Public Health Needs. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):249-255.
Adam D. Moore (2010). Privacy, Public Health, and Controlling Medical Information. HEC Forum 22 (3):225-240.
Tom Walker (2011). Informed Consent and the Requirement to Ensure Understanding. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):50-62.
Leslie Cannold (1997). "There Is No Evidence to Suggest...": Changing the Way We Judge Information for Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process. Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184.
Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick J. Kenney, Sarah Allen Gershon, Karen Shafer & Gina Serignese Woodall, Capturing the Power of a Campaign Event: The 2004 Presidential Debate in Tempe.
Judith Wagner DeCew (2004). Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,252 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?