David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):529-538 (2011)
The concept of minimal risk plays a key role in federal regulations on the protection of human research subjects. Although there has been considerable discussion of the meaning of minimal risk, the question of how this concept should be interpreted in research involving pregnant women and fetuses has not been addressed. This essay reviews the literature on minimal risk and argues for an interpretation of that concept in the context of research involving pregnant women and fetuses
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
C. Strong (2012). Abortion Decisions as Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):43-47.
Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth Faden (2008). The Second Wave: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):5 - 22.
Verina Wild (2012). How Are Pregnant Women Vulnerable Research Participants? International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):82-104.
Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer, Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception From Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.
S. Napier (2009). A Regulatory Argument Against Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (5):496-508.
Helen M. Sharp & Robert D. Orr (2004). When "Minimal Risk" Research Yields Clinically-Significant Data, Maybe the Risks Aren't So Minimal. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):32-36.
T. Howard Stone (2004). Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Discerning Minimal Risk in Research Involving Prisoners as Human Subjects. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32 (3):535-537.
Nancy E. Kass, Holly A. Taylor & Patricia A. King (1996). Harms of Excluding Pregnant Women From Clinical Research: The Case of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 24 (1):36-46.
Celia B. Fisher (2005). Deception Research Involving Children: Ethical Practices and Paradoxes. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287.
Patrick D. Hopkins (2008). Can Technology Fix the Abortion Problem? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):311-326.
Celia B. Fisher, Susan Z. Kornetsky & Ernest D. Prentice (2007). Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5 – 10.
Lainie Friedman Ross (2004). Convening a 407 Panel for Research Not Otherwise Approvable: "Precursors to Diabetes in Japanese American Youth" as a Case Study. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):165-186.
Eric Chwang (2010). Against Risk-Benefit Review of Prisoner Research. Bioethics 24 (1):14-22.
Added to index2011-08-23
Total downloads19 ( #203,823 of 1,911,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?