David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 5 (4):287-295 (2010)
Philosophy is a radical inquiry whose task is to interrogate the fundamental assumptions of some given activity, discipline, or set of beliefs. In doing so, philosophical inquiry must attempt to delineate a problem and to develop a method for resolving that problem. However, to be true to its intention, philosophy must be able to examine not only the object of its inquiry but also its own method of interrogation. To accomplish this task, philosophical inquiry must be able to create a distance not only from the assumptions under investigation but also from its own assumptions, which is to say, that it must be able to raise questions about its own method. This self-reflexivity requires that any given philosophical investigation must be examined from an alternative vantage point. Since the assumptions which inform the inquiry are deeply imbedded within a given culture, immanent critique is insufficient. The only way to step outside the boundaries of these cultural presuppositions is to reflect on the given problem from the vantage point of another culture's philosophical tradition. Thus, I argue that philosophical inquiry is unable to go beyond certain limits without being cross-cultural philosophy. I illustrate the way in which cross-cultural philosophy does this with respect to the problem of the self by placing the Western philosophical approach to this problem in dialogue with the Indian Hindu-Buddhist narrative.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Derek Parfit (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2007). Critique of Pure Reason. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 449-451.
G. H. Mead (forthcoming). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, Il.
Jean-Paul Sartre (1956). Being and Nothingness. Distributed by Random House.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Higgins & Alexis Dyschkant (2014). Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 45 (3):372-398.
Similar books and articles
Timothy B. Leduc (2007). Approaching a Climatic Research Ettiquette. Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):45-70.
Carola Sandbacka (1987). Understanding Other Cultures: Studies in the Philosophical Problems of Cross-Cultural Interpretation. Distributed by Akateeminen Kirjakauppa.
Terence Jackson (2011). International Management Ethics: A Critical, Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Bradley L. Herling (2006). The German Gītā: Hermeneutics and Discipline in the German Reception of Indian Thought, 1778-1831. Routledge.
Bradley Douglas Park (2004). Differing Ways, Dao and Weg: Comparative, Metaphysical, and Methodological Considerations in Heidegger's “Aus Einem Gespräch Von der Sprache”. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (3):309-339.
Leigh K. Jenco (2012). How Meaning Moves: Tan Sitong on Borrowing Across Cultures. Philosophy East and West 62 (1):92-113.
Xize Deng (2010). Problem and Method: The Possibility of Comparative Study—Using “Lun Liujia Yaozhi” as an Example. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):575-600.
Paul Healy (2000). Self-Other Relations and the Rationality of Cultures. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):61-83.
Added to index2010-04-09
Total downloads24 ( #166,247 of 1,911,817 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #255,606 of 1,911,817 )
How can I increase my downloads?