David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):559-570 (2009)
Abstract: This paper is an attempt to identify and to suggest reasons to reject those assumptions about the nature and scope of perceptual knowledge that appear to make an unacceptable scepticism the only strictly defensible answer to the philosophical problem of knowledge of the world in general. The suggestion is that our knowing things about the world around us by perception can be satisfactorily explained only if we can be understood to sometimes perceive that such-and-such is so, where what we perceive to be so is the very state of the world that we thereby know to be so. This is not proposed as a better answer to the philosophical problem, but as a way of seeing how that problem as traditionally understood could not really present a threat to anyone who can think about the world at all.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James Pryor (2000). The Skeptic and the Dogmatist. Noûs 34 (4):517–549.
René Descartes (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Penelope Maddy (2007). Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Chris Ranalli (2014). Luck, Propositional Perception, and the Entailment Thesis. Synthese 191 (6):1223-1247.
Barry Stroud (2013). Doing Something Intentionally and Knowing That You Are Doing It. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):1-12.
Barry Stroud (2009). Explaining Perceptual Knowledge: Reply to Quassim Cassam. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):590-596.
Kaplan Hasanoglu (2016). Against the Conditional Correctness of Scepticism. South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):82-91.
Similar books and articles
Howard Sankey (2012). Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument From the Criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
Wai-Hung Wong (2011). What the Skeptic Still Can't Learn From How We Use the Word 'Know'. In J. Bridges, N. Kolodny & W. Wong (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Reflections on the Thought of Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press
David Macarthur (2003). McDowell, Scepticism, and the 'Veil of Perception'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):175-190.
Samir Okasha (2003). Scepticism and its Sources. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):610–632.
Barry Stroud (1984). The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford University Press.
Wai-hung Wong (2002). The Problem of Insulation. Philosophy 77 (3):349-373.
Barry Stroud (2000). Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Alan Millar (2012). Scepticism, Perceptual Knowledge, and Doxastic Responsibility. Synthese 189 (2):353-372.
Sten Olaf Welding (2005). Kann Es Ein Argument Für den Skeptizismus Geben? Das Epistemische Problem der Irrtumsmöglichkeit. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (1):107 - 118.
Added to index2009-06-04
Total downloads244 ( #10,772 of 1,911,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #116,720 of 1,911,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?