David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
University of Chicago Press (1997)
Leo Strauss articulates the conflict between reason and revelation as he explores Spinoza's scientific, comparative, and textual treatment of the Bible. Strauss compares Spinoza's Theologico-political Treatise and the Epistles, showing their relation to critical controversy on religion from Epicurus and Lucretius through Uriel da Costa and Isaac Peyrere to Thomas Hobbes. Strauss's autobiographical Preface, traces his dilemmas as a young liberal intellectual in Germany during the Weimar Republic, as a scholar in exile, and as a leader of American philosophical thought. "[For] those interested in Strauss the political philosopher, and also those who doubt whether we have achieved the 'final solution' in respect to either the character of political science or the problem of the relation of religion to the state." -- Journal of Politics "A substantial contribution to the thinking of all those interested in the ageless problems of faith, revelation, and reason." -- Kirkus Reviews Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of political science at the University of Chicago. His contributions to political science include The Political Philosophy of Hobbes, The City and the Man, What is Political Philosophy?, and Liberalism Ancient and Modern.
|Keywords||Religion Controversial literature|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$18.02 used (47% off) $23.00 new (33% off) $30.60 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B3985.Z7.S7313 1997|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Grant Havers (2015). The Politics of Paradox: Leo Strauss’s Biblical Debt to Spinoza. Sophia 54 (4):525-543.
Michael Lebuffe (2005). Spinoza's Summum Bonum. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):243–266.
Paul O'Mahoney (2011). Jerusalem in Athens: On the Biblical Epigraphs to Leo Strauss's Natural Right and History. Heythrop Journal 53 (3):418-431.
Matthew J. Kisner (2012). Spinoza’s Liberalism. Philosophy Compass 7 (11):782-793.
Michael Ehrmantraut (2012). Rejoinder: Michael Ehrmantraut. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):576-578.
Similar books and articles
Nancy Levene (2004). Spinoza's Revelation: Religion, Democracy, and Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Benedictus de Spinoza (1883). A Theologico-Political Treatise. Dover Publications.
Thomas L. Pangle (2006). Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Leo Strauss (1936). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
Leo Strauss (1975). The Argument and the Action of Plato's Laws. University of Chicago Press.
Leo Strauss (2011). Hobbes's Critique of Religion and Related Writings. The University of Chicago Press.
Leo Strauss (1952). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes, its Basis and its Genesis. [Chicago]University of Chicago Press.
Leora Faye Batnitzky (2006). Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge University Press.
Jacob Schiff (2010). From Anti-Liberal to Untimely Liberal: Leo Strauss' Two Critiques of Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):157-181.
Heinrich Meier (2006). Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #101,627 of 1,932,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #332,993 of 1,932,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?