David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cognition 74 (149):175 (2000)
Recent work on children’s inferences concerning biological and chemical categories has suggested that children (and perhaps adults) are essentialists— a view known as psychological essentialism. I distinguish three varieties of psychological essentialism and investigate the ways in which essentialism explains the inferences for which it is supposed to account. Essentialism succeeds in explaining the inferences, I argue, because it attributes to the child belief in causal laws connecting category membership and the possession of certain characteristic appearances and behavior. This suggests that the data will be equally well explained by a non-essentialist hypothesis that attributes belief in the appropriate causal laws to the child, but makes no claim as to whether or not the child represents essences. I provide several reasons to think that this non-essentialist hypothesis is in fact superior to any version of the essentialist hypothesis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Susan A. Gelman & Ellen M. Markman (1986). Categories and Induction in Young Children. Cognition 23 (3):183-209.
Noam Chomsky (1995). Language and Nature. Mind 104 (413):1-61.
Susan A. Gelman & Henry M. Wellman (1991). Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Non-Obvious. Cognition 38 (3):213-244.
Rochel Gelman (1990). First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning About Relevant Data: Number and the Animate‐Inanimate Distinction as Examples. Cognitive Science 14 (1):79-106.
Hilary Putnam (1970). Is Semantics Possible? Metaphilosophy 1 (3):187–201.
Citations of this work BETA
Sandeep Prasada & Elaine M. Dillingham (2006). Principled and Statistical Connections in Common Sense Conception. Cognition 99 (1):73-112.
Jussi Haukioja (2015). On Deriving Essentialism From the Theory of Reference. Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2141-2151.
Paul Griffiths, Edouard Machery & Stefan Linquist (2009). The Vernacular Concept of Innateness. Mind and Language 24 (5):605-630.
Sandeep Prasada & Elaine M. Dillingham (2009). Representation of Principled Connections: A Window Onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception. Cognitive Science 33 (3):401-448.
Michael Strevens (2014). High-Level Exceptions Explained. Erkenntnis 79 (10):1819-1832.
Similar books and articles
Meredith Meyer, Sarah-Jane Leslie, Susan Gelman & Sarah Stilwell (2013). Essentialist Beliefs About Bodily Transplants in the United States and India. Cognitive Science 37 (1):668-710.
Uma Narayan (1998). Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism. Hypatia 13 (2):86 - 106.
Michael Della Rocca (2002). Essentialism Vs. Essentialism. In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press 223--252.
H. Clark Barrett (2001). On the Functional Origins of Essentialism. [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press) 2 (1):1-30.
W. Russ Payne, Some Good and Some Not so Good Arguments for Necessary Laws William Russell Payne Ph.D.
Alexander Bird (2005). Laws and Essences. Ratio 18 (4):437–461.
Matthew Tugby (2012). Rescuing Dispositionalism From the Ultimate Problem: Reply to Barker and Smart. Analysis 72 (4):723-731.
Ping Xu (1995). Irigaray's Mimicry and the Problem of Essentialism. Hypatia 10 (4):76-89.
Cressida Jane Heyes (1997). 'Back to the Rough Ground!': Wittgenstein, Essentialism, and Feminist Methods. Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Cressida J. Heyes (1997). Anti‐Essentialism in Practice: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Philosophy. Hypatia 12 (3):142-163.
Mary P. Winsor (2003). Non-Essentialist Methods in Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy. Biology and Philosophy 18 (3):387-400.
Gyula Klima (2005). The Essentialist Nominalism of John Buridan. Review of Metaphysics 58 (4):739 - 754.
Maja Malec (2009). Essentialism Contextualized. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):201-217.
Added to index2011-05-22
Total downloads35 ( #112,226 of 1,792,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #207,320 of 1,792,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?