David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:269-274 (2000)
Philosophy differs from most other disciplines in that one of the questions with which its practitioners are professionally concerned is its own nature. There is nothing surprising about this since, having no special subject-matter of its own, it is free—and perhaps obliged—to enquire into the special nature of every discipline. But, such an obligation presumes that we know what in general we are—or should be—up to in philosophy. What is, in fact, our objective? To establish how we should live, the nature of the good life? To determine the scope and limits of human knowledge? To achieve self-understanding? If properly understood, I think the last suggestion is correct. I do not mean that we should turn into psychologists or social scientists. Rather, I mean that our essential, if not our only, business is to get a clear view of our most general working concepts or types of concept and of their place in our lives. We should aim at general human conceptual self-understanding
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marjorie Grene (2000). What Have We Learned From Philosophy in the Twentieth Century? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:257-261.
Kelby Mason, Chandra Sekhar Sripada & Stephen Stich (2008). The Philosophy of Psychology. In Dermot Moran (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge
John Ryder (ed.) (1994). American Philosophic Naturalism in the Twentieth Century. Prometheus Books.
Jaime Nubiola (1998). C. S. Peirce and the Hispanic Philosophy of the Twentieth Century. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24 (1):31-49.
James Rachels (2000). Naturalism. In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers
David E. Leary (2004). On the Conceptual and Linguistic Activity of Psychologists: The Study of Behavior From the 1890s to the 1990s and Beyond. [REVIEW] Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):13 - 35.
Jan Olof Bengtsson (2006). The Worldview of Personalism: Origins and Early Development. Oxford University Press.
Steve Fuller (2002). Prolegomena to a Sociology of Philosophy in the Twentieth-Century English-Speaking World. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):151-177.
Erwin Schrödinger (1951). Nature and the Greeks. Cambridge University Press.
Chantal Delsol (2006). The Unlearned Lessons of the Twentieth Century: An Essay on Late Modernity. Isi Books.
John F. X. Knasas (2003). Being and Some Twentieth-Century Thomists. Fordham University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads27 ( #157,144 of 1,938,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #219,228 of 1,938,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?