David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):6 (2007)
This paper explores a novel philosophy of ethical care in the face of burgeoning biomedical technologies. I respond to a serious challenge facing traditional bioethics with its roots in analytic philosophy. The hallmarks of these traditional approaches are reason and autonomy, founded on a belief in the liberal humanist subject. In recent years, however, there have been mounting challenges to this view of human subjectivity, emerging from poststructuralist critiques, such as Michel Foucault's, but increasingly also as a result of advances in biotechnology itself. In the face of these developments, I argue that the theoretical relevance and practical application of mainstream bioethics is increasingly under strain. Traditionalists will undoubtedly resist. Together, professional philosopher-bioethicists, public health policymakers, and the global commercial healthcare industry tend to respond conservatively by shoring up the liberal humanist subject as the foundation for medical ethics and consumer decision-making, appealing to the familiar tropes of reason, autonomy, and freedom
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Elin Palm (2012). A Declaration of Healthy Dependence: The Case of Home Care. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (4):1-20.
Stuart J. Murray, Dave Holmes, Amélie Perron & Geneviève Rail (2008). Towards an Ethics of Authentic Practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):682-689.
Mary K. Bryson & Jackie Stacey (2013). Cancer Knowledge in the Plural: Queering the Biopolitics of Narrative and Affective Mobilities. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2):197-212.
Dan J. Stein (2012). Psychopharmacological Enhancement: A Conceptual Framework. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 7 (1):5-.
Similar books and articles
Fred Feldman, What is the Rational Care Theory of Welfare? A Comment on Stephen Darwall's Welfare and Rational Care.
Joseph Raz (2004). The Role of Well‐Being. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):269–294.
Mark J. Hanson (1999). Biotechnology and Commodification Within Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):267 – 287.
Carmel Shalev (2012). An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third-Party Reproduction. Medicine Studies 3 (3):147-156.
Carlo Casonato (ed.) (2007). Life, Technology, and Law: Second Forum for Transnational and Comparative Legal Dialogue, Levico Terme, Italy, June 9-10, 2006: Proceedings. [REVIEW] Cedam.
M. J. Charlesworth (1989). Life, Death, Genes, and Ethics: Biotechnology and Bioethics. Abc Enterprises for the Australian Broadcasting Corp..
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1992). The Good Life and the Human Good. Cambridge University Press.
Michael B. Gill (2009). Is the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide Compatible with Good End-of-Life Care? Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):27-45.
Margrit Shildrick (2004). Reconfiguring the Bioethics of Reproduction. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):77-85.
Mickey Gjerris (2008). The Three Teachings of Biotechnology. In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press
Lawrence Busch & John R. Lloyd (2008). What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology? In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press
Jacqueline A. Laing (2005). Artificial Reproduction, the 'Welfare Principle', and the Common Good. Medical Law Review 13:328-356.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2010). Health Care, Capabilities, and Ai Assistive Technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181 - 190.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads12 ( #200,659 of 1,725,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?