Review: Sacks, Insight and Objectivity [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kant-Studien 97:239-243 (2006)
I criticize Sacks' ambitious work on objectivity and its history in modern philosophy in three main regards: First, Sacks tends to oversimplify the different views of Descartes, Locke, and Hume, which are not all haunted in the same sense by a "subject-driven skepticism". Second, Kant's conception of objectivity isn't directed (primarily) at refuting external world skepticism. Third, Sacks assumes that it is clear what transcendental idealism is: a doctrine that asserts an ontological distinction between "appearances" and "things in themselves". This ignores the deep interpretive and systematical discussions about this doctrine. In sum, the book lacks a proper historical diagnosis of where current notions of objectivity come from, or how our agenda has changed from those of early modern philosophers.
|Keywords||Objectivity Kant Descartes Skeptisism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark Sacks (2000). Objectivity and Insight. Oxford University Press.
Patti Nogales (2002). Sacks, Mark. Objectivity and Insight. Review of Metaphysics 55 (4):875-876.
Mark Sacks (1997). Transcendental Constraints and Transcendental Features. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):164 – 186.
Jennifer Tannoch-Bland (1997). From Aperspectival Objectivity to Strong Objectivity: The Quest for Moral Objectivity. Hypatia 12 (1):155 - 178.
Richard Dien Winfield (2002). Objectivity in Logic and Nature. The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):77-89.
Robert Albin (2012). BEYOND MODES OF OBJECTIVITY. Logos and Episteme (3):361-371.
Stephen Gaukroger (2012). Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the MIT Press.
Patrick Fleming (2004). Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis. Idealistic Studies 34 (2):173-180.
Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.
Brian Leiter (ed.) (2001). Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Heather Douglas (2004). The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity. Synthese 138 (3):453 - 473.
Felix Mühlhölzer (1988). On Objectivity. Erkenntnis 28 (2):185 - 230.
Evelyn Wortsman Deluty (2005). Wittgenstein's Paradox. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):87-102.
A. B. Dickerson (2003). Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-10-26
Total downloads3 ( #596,211 of 1,790,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?