Mark Sacks: Insight and Objectivity [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Kant-Studien 97:239-243 (2006)
|Abstract||I criticize Sacks' ambitious work on objectivity and its history in modern philosophy in three main regards: First, Sacks tends to oversimplify the different views of Descartes, Locke, and Hume, which are not all haunted in the same sense by a "subject-driven skepticism". Second, Kant's conception of objectivity isn't directed (primarily) at refuting external world skepticism. Third, Sacks assumes that it is clear what transcendental idealism is: a doctrine that asserts an ontological distinction between "appearances" and "things in themselves". This ignores the deep interpretive and systematical discussions about this doctrine. In sum, the book lacks a proper historical diagnosis of where current notions of objectivity come from, or how our agenda has changed from those of early modern philosophers.|
|Keywords||Objectivity Kant Descartes Skeptisism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Sacks (2000). Objectivity and Insight. Oxford University Press.
Patti Nogales (2002). Sacks, Mark. Objectivity and Insight. The Review of Metaphysics 55 (4):875-876.
Mark Sacks (1997). Transcendental Constraints and Transcendental Features. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):164 – 186.
Jennifer Tannoch-Bland (1997). From Aperspectival Objectivity to Strong Objectivity: The Quest for Moral Objectivity. Hypatia 12 (1):155 - 178.
Richard Dien Winfield (2002). Objectivity in Logic and Nature. The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):77-89.
Robert Albin (2012). BEYOND MODES OF OBJECTIVITY. Logos and Episteme (3):361-371.
Stephen Gaukroger (2012). Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the Mit Press.
Patrick Fleming (2004). Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis. Idealistic Studies 34 (2):173-180.
Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.
Brian Leiter (ed.) (2001). Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Heather Douglas (2004). The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity. Synthese 138 (3):453 - 473.
Felix Mühlhölzer (1988). On Objectivity. Erkenntnis 28 (2):185 - 230.
Evelyn Wortsman Deluty (2005). Wittgenstein's Paradox. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):87-102.
A. B. Dickerson (2003). Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-10-26
Total downloads3 ( #213,731 of 739,346 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?