Studies in East European Thought 59 (1-2):101 - 169 (2007)
|Abstract||Drawing on the Second Discourse and the Social Contract and Notes from Underground and “The Dream of a Ridiculous Man,” this essay examines the striking similarities and fundamental differences between Dostoevskij’s and Rousseau’s treatment of the problem of individual vs. society and their notions of ideal social relations. The essay investigates Rousseau’s attempt to absorb morality into politics and “to concretize” Diderot’s universal moral man into citizen. It also suggests that Dostoevskij takes Rousseau’s attempt at concretization a step further by exposing humanist conceptions of man and society in general as fiction and creating a model of ideal society that absorbs morality, not into politics (as does Rousseau’s model), but into the sanctity of the Word.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Niko Kolodny (2009). Comment on Munoz-Dardé's'liberty's Chains'. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):197-212.
Timothy O'Hagan (1999). Rousseau. Routledge.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
David James (2013). Rousseau on Dependence and the Formation of Political Society. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):343-366.
Alina Wyman (2007). The Specter of Freedom: Ressentiment and Dostoevskij's Notes From Underground. Studies in East European Thought 59 (1-2):119 - 140.
Matthew Simpson (2006). A Paradox of Sovereignty in Rousseau's Social Contract. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):45-56.
Maurice William Cranston (1972). Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Maurizio Viroli (1988). Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the "Well-Ordered Society". Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,562 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?