David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Theory 39 (2):147–166 (2000)
After a brief review of the origins and the nature of the received canon of the history of political thought, this essay discusses the critiques that have been leveled at it over the past decades. Two major lines of critique are distinguished: 1. The democratic critique, focusing on the omission of "plebeian," non-Western, and female voices from the traditional canon, as well as the failure of the canon to discuss issues such as popular radicalism, patriarchal rule, and the politics of empire. 2. The methodological critique in which the canon is deconstructed as an anachronistic, "Whiggish" enterprise, and its validity as history is questioned against the background of "history after the linguistic turn." The essay examines the consequences of both lines of criticism for some key concepts in the history of political thought, as well as for the coherence and the structure of the traditional canon. It calls attention to the paradox that, while virtually all elements of the canon have been subjected to incisive critique, the canon itself has so far survived relatively unscathed in the major textbooks and in the way the subject is taught in universities the world over. In the final section the question is raised what a new, reconstructed overall history of political thought might look like, and some preliminary suggestions are offered towards a revision of the canon that would satisfy both the democratic and the methodological critique
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Aaron Kamugisha (2007). Critical Notice: Orientalism, Western Republicanism, and the Ancient Polis: Patricia Springborg's Western Republicanism and the Oriental Prince and the Canon of Political Thought. Philosophical Forum 38 (2):173–198.
Similar books and articles
Ryan K. Balot (2006). Greek Political Thought. Blackwell Pub..
Scott Warren (1984). The Emergence of Dialectical Theory: Philosophy and Political Inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Sean Greenberg (2005). From Canon to Dialectic to Antinomy: Giving Inclinations Their Due. Inquiry 48 (3):232 – 248.
Catherine Mills (2010). A Manner of Speaking: Declaration, Critique and the Trope of Interrogation. Law and Critique 21 (3):247--260.
David Boucher & P. J. Kelly (eds.) (2003). Political Thinkers: From Socrates to the Present. Oxford University Press.
Takashi Shogimen (1999). The Relationship Between Theology and Canon Law: Another Context of Political Thought in the Early Fourteenth Century. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (3):417-431.
Simon Fitzpatrick (2008). Doing Away with Morgan’s Canon. Mind and Language 23 (2):224–246.
Anthony Burns (2011). Conceptual History and the Philosophy of the Later Wittgenstein: A Critique of Quentin Skinners Contextualist Method. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):54-83.
Martin Montminy (2005). What Use is Morgan's Canon? Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):399-414.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #170,274 of 1,790,235 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,635 of 1,790,235 )
How can I increase my downloads?