The direct argument for incompatibilism
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):459-466 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Control Ethics Incompatibilism Responsibility Fischer, J Ravizza, M | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKevin Timpe (2007). Source Incompatibilism and its Alternatives. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):284-299.
John Martin Fischer (2000). Problems with Actual-Sequence Incompatibilism. Journal of Ethics 4 (4):323-328.
Joseph Keim Campbell (2006). Farewell to Direct Source Incompatibilism. Acta Analytica 21 (4).
David Zimmerman (2002). Reasons-Responsiveness and Ownership-of-Agency: Fischer and Ravizza's Historicist Theory of Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 6 (3):199-234.
Ira M. Schnall & David Widerker (2012). The Direct Argument and the Burden of Proof. Analysis 72 (1):25-36.
Seth Shabo (2010). The Fate of the Direct Argument and the Case for Incompatibilism. Philosophical Studies 150 (3):405-424.
Katarzyna Paprzycka (2002). Flickers of Freedom and Frankfurt-Style Cases in the Light of the New Incompatibilism of the Stit Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:553-565.
Eric Yang (2012). Defending Direct Source Incompatibilism. Acta Analytica 27 (3):325-333.
D. Vander-Laan (2001). A Regress Argument for Restrictive Incompatibilism. Philosophical Studies 103 (2):201-215.
Carl Ginet (2006). Working with Fischer and Ravizza's Account of Moral Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 10 (3):229-253.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads48 ( #22,348 of 548,999 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,999 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
