David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 6 (4):353-377 (1989)
In this paper I juxtapose a representative sample of contemporary historical biblical scholarship, namely, Raymond Brown’s well-regarded interpretation of the empty tomb stories in the Gospel of John, with an example of biblical exegesis drawn from a typical medieval play, Visitatio Sepulchri. The point of the comparison is to consider the presuppositions on which these differing approaches to the biblical texts are based, The naive inattention to history shown by the play shows the importance of the work of historically oriented biblical critics. On the other hand, reflection on the methodology of the play provides some reason for doubting that the methodology employed by Brown is acceptable in every case
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward G. Belaga (1991). On The Rabbinical Exegesis of an Enhanced Biblical Value of Pi. In Hardi Grant, Israel Kleiner & Abe Shenitzer (eds.), Proc. of the 17th Congress of the Canadian Society of History and Philosophy of Mathematics. Kingston
Sebastian Rehnman (2002). Theistic Metaphysics and Biblical Exegesis: Francis Turretin on the Concept of God. Religious Studies 38 (2):167-186.
Richard S. Briggs (2009). Participatory Biblical Exegesis: A Theology of Biblical Interpretation. By Matthew Levering. Heythrop Journal 50 (1):172-172.
H. Chadwick (1963). John Charles Doudna: The Greek of the Gospel of Mark. (Journal of Biblical Literature, Monograph Series, Xii.) Pp. 139. Philadelphia: Society of Biblical Literature and Exegesis, 1961. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (01):115-.
Richard S. Briggs (2009). Reading the Bible with the Dead: What You Can Learn From the History of Exegesis That You Can't Learn From Exegesis Alone. By John L. Thompson Reading the Bible with Giants: How 2000 Years of Biblical Interpretation Can Shed New Light on Old Texts. By David Paul Parris. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (1):120-122.
Benjamin Sargent (2012). John Milbank and Biblical Hermeneutics: The End of the Historical-Critical Method? Heythrop Journal 53 (2):253-263.
K. H. (1959). Biblical Exegesis in the Qumran Texts. Review of Metaphysics 13 (2):355-355.
Richard H. Hiers (1984). Ecology, Biblical Theology, and Methodology: Biblical Perspectives on the Environment. Zygon 19 (1):43-59.
James S. Preus (2001). Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge University Press.
Sandra Duncan (2000). Signa de Caelo in the Lives of St Cuthbert: The Impact of Biblical Images and Exegesis on Early Medieval Hagiography. Heythrop Journal 41 (4):399–412.
Reid A. Ashbaucher (ed.) (2011). Made in the Image of God: Understanding the Nature of God and Mankind in a Changing World. Innovo Pub..
Frederick van Fleteren (1996). Augustine's Principles of Biblical Exegesis, De Doctrina Christiana Aside. Augustinian Studies 27 (2):107-128.
Geoffrey Turner (2007). Biblical Interpretation: The Meanings of Scripture – Past and Present. Edited by John M. Court; a History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 1: The Ancient Period. Edited by Alan J. Hauser & Duane F. Watson and the Journey From Texts to Translations: The Origin and Development of the Bible. By Paul D. Wegner. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 48 (1):109–110.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads38 ( #115,794 of 2,239,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #99,917 of 2,239,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?