Why does history matter to philosophy and the sciences? Editor's introduction.

In Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (eds.), Why does history matter to philosophy and the sciences? De Gruyter (2005)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy of Science  History of Science  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Between Science and Literature: The Debate on the Status of History. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):7-30.
    Rachel Laudan (1992). The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-03-26

    Total downloads

    62 ( #20,235 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    37 ( #1,987 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.