What's wrong with the aristotelian theory of sensible qualities?
Phronesis 42 (3):263-282 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesA. H. Hannay (1928). Primary and Secondary Qualities. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 29:51 - 66.
John Holloway (1947). Ethical Qualities. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48:13 - 28.
Stephen Puryear (2013). Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):319-346.
Robert Schroer (2002). Matching Sensible Qualities: A Skeleton in the Closet for Representationalism. Philosophical Studies 107 (3):259-73.
Robert Pasnau (2006). A Theory of Secondary Qualities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):568–591.
Shane Duarte (2009). Ideas and Confusion in Leibniz. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):705-733.
G. F. Stout (1903). Primary and Secondary Qualities. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 4:141-160.
Alex Byrne (forthcoming). Sensory Qualities, Sensible Qualities, Sensational Qualities. In Beckermann, McLaughlin & Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Todd Stuart Ganson (1997). What's Wrong with the Aristotelian Theory of Sensible Qualities? Phronesis 42 (3):263-282.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
