David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We know from more than two millenia of experience that self-referential statements, such as the liar's ("This very statement is false"), can be debated by philosophers and logicians for millenia without producing consensus on their solutions. We should not be surprised, then, if self-referential laws produce paradoxes which puzzle lawyers. What is surprising, though, is that some of these paradoxes bother only the logicians and philosophers who study law from outside, and do not bother lawyers at all. This fact should interest philosophers of law even more than the paradoxes themselves.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Albert A. Johnstone (2002). The Liar Syndrome. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):37-55.
P. S. Atiyah (1981/1982). Promises, Morals, and Law. Clarendon Press.
M. B. E. Smith (1990). Should Lawyers Listen to Philosophers About Legal Ethics? Law and Philosophy 9 (1):67 - 93.
Barry Hartley Slater, Logical Paradoxes. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Greg Restall (2007). Curry's Revenge: The Costs of Non-Classical Solutions to the Paradoxes of Self-Reference. In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press
Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason (2011). Paradoxes of Intensionality. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.
Matthew Lister (2011). The Legitimating Role of Consent in International Law. Chicago Journal of International Law 11 (2).
Stephen Shute, John Gardner & Jeremy Horder (eds.) (1993). Action and Value in Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Claire Grant (2012). Secret Laws. Ratio Juris 25 (3):301-317.
Michał Walicki (2009). Reference, Paradoxes and Truth. Synthese 171 (1):195 - 226.
Robert C. Hughes (2013). Law and Coercion. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):231-240.
Roy A. Sorensen (1998). Yablo's Paradox and Kindred Infinite Liars. Mind 107 (425):137-155.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads9 ( #359,175 of 1,849,453 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,493 of 1,849,453 )
How can I increase my downloads?