David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Society 57 (2):133 - 159 (1993)
This paper has two interrelated aims. One is a criticism of the recent book by Eric Olin Wright, Andrew Levine and Elliott Sober, "Reconstructing Marxism". It is argued that many of the book's key concepts and premises are obscure; sometimes, when clear enough for logical relations to be established, inconsistent with one another; and nearly always open to objections. The same is true of the arguments (where they can be identified) to the conclusions. The book's basic philosophical stance is, in regard to its combination of essentialism and empiricism, Aristotelian. The second aim is to sketch an alternative view of the general character of historical materialism, based closely on Marx's "mature" practice as theoretician, and on many of his key statements of principle. This view involves a sharp distinction between the context of theory and the context of the real (the understanding and change of the latter being the point of the former), and, in the theoretical domain, a distinction among levels of abstractness or generality.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Erik Olin Wright, Andrew Levine & Elliott Sober (1994). Reconstructing Marxism: A Reply. Science and Society 58 (1):53 - 60.
Richard Schmitt (1994). Book Review:Reconstructing Marxism: Essays on Explanation and the Theory of History. Erik Olin Wright, Andrew Levine, Elliot Sober. [REVIEW] Ethics 104 (4):906-.
Erik Olin Wright (1992). Reconstructing Marxism: Essays on Explanation and the Theory of History. Verso.
Duncan K. Foley (1993). Reconstructing Marxism, by Wright Erik Olin, Levine Andrew, and Sober Elliot. London and New York: Verso, 1992, Xii + 202 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 9 (02):297-.
Tom Rockmore (1996). Merleau-Ponty, Marx, and Marxism: The Problem of History. Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):63 - 81.
Erik Olin Wright, Andrew Levine & Elliott Sober (2003). Marxism and Methodological Individualism. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Richard Hudelson (2006). Marx for the Present. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):105-115.
Roberto Veneziani (2008). Review Essay: A Future for (Analytical) Marxism? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):388-399.
W. Suchting (1994). Reconstructing Marxism: Some Comments on Comments. Science and Society 58 (3):325 - 331.
Hongmei Qu (2011). Marxism and Morality: Reflections on the History of Interpreting Marx in Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):239-257.
Alex Callinicos (1983/1985). Marxism and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Eric Engle, The Red Queen Meets the Cheshire Cat? Mackinnon, Marx and the Mirror Stage of Production.
John O'Neill (1986). Scientific Socialism and Democracy: A Response to Femia. Inquiry 29 (1-4):345-353.
Tom Rockmore (2000). On Recovering Marx After Marxism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):95-106.
Ronald Aronson (1994). Reconstructing Marxism. Radical Philosophy Review of Books 9 (9):1-9.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #306,410 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?