Enabling guanxi management in china: A hierarchical stakeholder model of effective guanxi [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 71 (3):301 - 319 (2007)
Guanxi (literally interpersonal connections) is in essence a network of resource coalition-based stakeholders sharing resources for survival, and it plays a key role in achieving business success in China. However, the salience of guanxi stakeholders varies: not all guanxi relationships are necessary, and among the necessary guanxi participants, not all are equally important. A hierarchical stakeholder model of guanxi is developed drawing upon Mitchell et al.’s (1997) stakeholder salience theory and Anderson’s (1982) constituency theory. As an application of instrumental stakeholder theory, the model dimensionalizes the notion of stakeholder salience, and distinguishes between and among internal and external guanxi, core, major, and peripheral guanxi, and primary and secondary guanxi stakeholders. Guanxi management principles are developed based on a hierarchy of guanxi priorities and management specializations. The goal of this application of instrumental stakeholder theory is to construct, for Western business firms in China, a means to reliably identify guanxi partners by employing the principles of effective guanxi. These principles are described in the form of testable propositions that advance social scientific research in this area of international business ethics.
|Keywords||China guanxi guanxi management stakeholder salience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Meiling Wong (2010). Guanxi Management as Complex Adaptive Systems: A Case Study of Taiwanese Odi in China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (3):419 - 432.
Yi Zhang & Zigang Zhang (2006). Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics in China: A Link Between Individual and Organizational Levels. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4):375 - 392.
Olwen Bedford (2011). Guanxi-Building in the Workplace: A Dynamic Process Model of Working and Backdoor Guanxi. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1):149-158.
Chenting Su, M. Joseph Sirgy & James E. Littlefield (2003). Is Guanxi Orientation Bad, Ethically Speaking? A Study of Chinese Enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):303 - 312.
Ying Fan (2002). Ganxi's Consequences: Personal Gains at Social Cost. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 38 (4):371 - 380.
Thomas W. Dunfee & Danielle E. Warren (2001). Is Guanxi Ethical? A Normative Analysis of Doing Business in China. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):191 - 204.
Chenting Su & James E. Littlefield (2001). Entering Guanxi: A Business Ethical Dilemma in Mainland China? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):199 - 210.
Liu Goggin, Aidan Kelly & John F. Hulpke (2007). Good Guanxi, Bad Guanxi? International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:297-312.
Liu Goggin, Aidan Kelly & John F. Hulpke (unknown). Good Guanxi, Bad Guanxi?: Drawing the Line. :297-312.
Danielle E. Warren, Thomas W. Dunfee & Naihe Li (2004). Social Exchange in China: The Double-Edged Sword of Guanxi. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):355 - 372.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #76,920 of 1,008,712 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,702 of 1,008,712 )
How can I increase my downloads?