Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 163 (2):453-457 (2013)
|Abstract||In this paper we argue that Steglich-Petersen’s response to Owens’ Exclusivity Objection does not work. Our first point is that the examples Steglich-Petersen uses to demonstrate his argument do not work because they employ an undefended conception of the truth aim not shared by his target (and officially eschewed by Steglich-Petersen himself). Secondly we will make the point that deliberating over whether to form a belief about p is not part of the belief forming process. When an agent enters into this process of deliberation, he has not, contra Steglich-Petersen, already adopted the truth aim with regard to p. In closing, we further suggest that proponents of the truth aim hypothesis need to focus on aim-guidance, not mere aim attribution, for their approach to have explanatory utility so underlining the significance of Owens’ argument|
|Keywords||Belief Aim Truth|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Conor McHugh (2012). Belief and Aims. Philosophical Studies 160 (3):425-439.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2009). Weighing the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Studies 145 (3):395 - 405.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (forthcoming). Truth as the Aim of Epistemic Justification. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
David J. Owens (2003). Does Belief Have an Aim? Philosophical Studies 115 (3):283-305.
Conor Mchugh (2011). What Do We Aim At When We Believe? Dialectica 65 (3):369-392.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Does Belief Aim (Only) at the Truth? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2006). No Norm Needed: On the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):499–516.
K. Gluer & A. Wikforss (2010). The Truth Norm and Guidance: A Reply to Steglich-Petersen. Mind 119 (475):757-761.
Masahiro Yamada (2012). Taking Aim at the Truth. Philosophical Studies 157 (1):47-59.
Anna Edmonds, Abandoning the Truth Aim a Reevaluation of the Aim of Belief and the Goal of Cognition.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2010). The Truth Norm and Guidance: A Reply to Gluer and Wikforss. Mind 119 (475):749-755.
Daniel Whiting (forthcoming). Nothing but the Truth: On the Norms and Aims of Belief. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief.
Ralph Wedgwood (forthcoming). The Right Thing to Believe. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2013). The No Guidance Argument. Theoria 79 (1):279-283.
Timothy Chan (2013). Introduction: Aiming at Truth. In , The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-10-03
Total downloads45 ( #29,143 of 749,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,892 of 749,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?