David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 113 (449):43-56 (2004)
Wittgenstein presents in the Tractatus a variable purporting to capture the general form of proposition. One understanding of what Wittgenstein is doing there, an understanding in line with the ‘new’ reading of his work championed by Diamond, Conant and others, sees it as a deflationary or even an implosive move—a move by which a concept sometimes put by philosophers to distinctively metaphysical use is replaced, in a perspicuous notation, by an innocent device of generalization, thereby dispersing the clouds of philosophy that formerly surrounded the concept. By asking how Wittgenstein supposed his variable to work, and what work he imagined it was fit for, the paper questions the adequacy of that understanding
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Cora Diamond (2011). 'We Can't Whistle It Either': Legend and Reality. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):335-356.
Stig Børsen Hansen (2012). Metaphysical Nihilism and Cosmological Arguments: Some Tractarian Comments. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):223-242.
Michael Price (2015). Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy, [Edited] by José L.Zalabardo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, Viii + 274 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-969152-4 £31.50. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 23:e9-e14.
Denis McManus (2009). The General Form of the Proposition: The Unity of Language and the Generality of Logic in the Early Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations 32 (4):295-318.
Chon Tejedor (2013). The Earlier Wittgenstein on the Notion of Religious Attitude. Philosophy 88 (01):55-79.
Similar books and articles
Kevin C. Klement (2004). Putting Form Before Function: Logical Grammar in Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. Philosophers' Imprint 4 (2):1-47.
Pasquale Frascolla (1997). The Tractatus System of Arithmetic. Synthese 112 (3):353-378.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (2007). The Good Sense of Nonsense: A Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus as Nonself-Repudiating. Philosophy 82 (1):147-177.
James Conant & Cora Diamond (2004). On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan. In Max Kölbel & Bernhard Weiss (eds.), Wittgenstein's lasting significance. Routledge
Lucy O'Brien, Final Version: O'Brien, L. F. , 'Solipsism and Self-Reference', European Journal of Philosophy 4:175-194.
Hao Tang (2011). Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):598-607.
A. W. Moore (2003). Ineffability and Nonsense. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169–193.
Peter Sullivan (2003). Ineffability and Nonsense. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):195–223.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #74,870 of 1,938,687 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #161,597 of 1,938,687 )
How can I increase my downloads?