David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4):465-479 (2011)
The doctrine of the communication of natures has played a primarily descriptive role in the history of Christology, and so it is perhaps unsurprising that it has largely gone missing from contemporary theology. This is a serious oversight. But Karl Barth is a noteworthy exception to the reductionist trend, and he provides the Reformed tradition's most complete and substantive engagement with the communication of natures and its implications for dogmatic theology. Through a close reading of volume IV/2 of the Church Dogmatics , this essay considers Karl Barth's vital emphasis upon the communicatio naturarum and the role it plays in his actualist Christology. Barth demonstrates that the traditional threefold communication (of attributes, graces, and operations) has material as well as formal importance. According to Barth, we see in Christ not the mere coincidence of two natures, nor an interpenetration, nor the transformation of one into the other – but mutual operation and interpretation, where divinity and humanity each acquires and has its determination in the other
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin Diller (2010). Karl Barth and the Relationship Between Philosophy and Theology. Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1035-1052.
Paul Brazier (2008). The Resurrection in Karl Barth (Barth Studies Series). By Robert Dale dawsonKarl Barth and Evangelical Theology: Convergences and Divergences. By Sung Chung (Editor). Heythrop Journal 49 (1):141–144.
Gerald P. McKenny (2010). The Analogy of Grace: Karl Barth's Moral Theology. Oxford University Press.
Daniel L. Migliore (ed.) (2010). Commanding Grace: Studies in Karl Barth's Ethics. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
S. W. Sykes (2007). Barth's Interpretation of the Bible in Karl Barth : Studies of His Theological Methods. In David Ford (ed.), Shaping Theology: Engagements in a Religious and Secular World. Blackwell Pub..
Amy Marga (2010). Karl Barth's Dialogue with Catholicism in Göttingen and Münster: Its Significance for His Doctrine of God. Mohr Siebeck.
Paul Brazier (2009). Karl Barth and the Strange New World Within the Bible: Barth, Wittgenstein and the Metadilemmas of the Enlightenment. By Neil B. MacDonald Being in Action: The Theological Shape of Barth's Ethical Vision. By Paul T. Nimmo. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (1):175-177.
Oliver O'Donovan (1991). Karl Barth and Ramsey's "Uses of Power". Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):1 - 30.
Nigel Biggar (1993). The Hastening That Waits: Karl Barth's Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Paul Brazier (2009). Barth, Israel and Jesus (Barth Studies Series). By Mark R. Lindsay and Barth's Theology of Interpretation (Barth Studies Series). By Donald Wood. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (6):1073-1075.
Robert E. Willis (1971). The Ethics of Karl Barth. Leiden,Brill.
Simon Fisher (1988). Revelatory Positivism?: Barth's Earliest Theology and the Marburg School. Oxford University Press.
Dr Peter S. Oh (2007). Complementary Dialectics of Kierkegaard and Barth: Barth's Use of Kierkegaardian Diastasis Reassessed. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 48 (4).
Nicholas Wolterstorff (1996). Barth on Evil. Faith and Philosophy 13 (4):584-608.
J. B. Webster (1995). Barth's Ethics of Reconciliation. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-15
Total downloads1 ( #306,509 of 1,089,104 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?