David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (01):207- (1996)
In recent years many people have suggested that rights come from traditions. More particularly, many people interested in American constitutional law have said that constitutional rights should be developed with close reference to American traditions. In this essay, I mean to challenge these claims. I argue that the enterprise of defining rights, including constitutional rights, should not be founded on an inquiry into tradition. Traditions should be assessed, not replicated. I also try to unpack some of the complexities in the idea that rights should be based on traditions. The topic is highly relevant to the debate over “communitarianism.” Manycommunitarians appear to be traditionalists, at least implicitly; they are concerned to defend social practices against abstract, acontextual claims about what is to be done, or about “rights.” It is important to ask why and when communitarians believethat a community's practices deserve insulation from rights–based claims. Often the best or most interesting answer has a Burkean dimension. It involves the extent to which a community—perhaps a local community resisting national efforts, perhaps a nation resisting international goals—owes its practices to long traditions that, precisely because of their longevity, might seem to make special sense. Ideas of this sort might be thought to have special strength when we think about rights in general or about constitutional rights in particular
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hilliard Aronovitch (1996). Reflective Equilibrium or Evolving Tradition? Inquiry 39 (3 & 4):399 – 419.
Similar books and articles
Blo-Bzaṅ-Chos-Kyi-Ñi-Ma (2009). The Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems: A Tibetan Study of Asian Religious Thought. Wisdom Publicatiaons.
James Alexander (2012). Three Rival Views of Tradition (Arendt, Oakeshott and MacIntyre). Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):20-43.
Stephen Prickett (2009). Modernity and the Reinvention of Tradition: Backing Into the Future. Cambridge University Press.
David van Mill (1998). The Voice of the People in the Legal Reasoning of Cass Sunstein. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):152-156.
Patricia Fagan (2013). Plato and Tradition: The Poetic and Cultural Context of Philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Mohammed Girma (2011). Whose Meaning? The Wax and Gold Tradition as a Philosophical Foundation for an Ethiopian Hermeneutic. Sophia 50 (1):175-187.
Mia Fuller (2004). Tradition as a Means to the End of Tradition : Farmer's Houses in Italy's Fascist-Era New Towns. In Nezar AlSayyad (ed.), The End of Tradition? Routledge
John Flett (1999). Alasdair MacIntyre's Tradition-Constituted Enquiry in Polanyian Perspective. Tradition and Discovery 26 (2):6-20.
Dorion Cairns (2011). Reflections on Tradition. Studia Phaenomenologica 11 (1):15-27.
Anna-Pya Sjödin (2011). Conceptualizing Philosophical Tradition: A Reading of Wilhelm Halbfass, Daya Krishna, and Jitendranath Mohanty. Philosophy East and West 61 (3):534-546.
Nicholas Rescher (2004). Respect for Tradition (And the Catholic Philosopher Today). Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:1-9.
Struan Jacobs (2007). Edward Shils' Theory of Tradition. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):139-162.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads9 ( #254,415 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?