David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):50-69 (2007)
This paper discusses the topics, goals, values and methods of Chinese logic. It holds that the goal of the research in Chinese logic is to reveal its structure, content, rules, and essential character, as well as to reveal both similarities and differences between Chinese and foreign logic. The value of the research is to carry forward and develop the outstanding heritage of Chinese logic. Its method is to annotate original works of Chinese ancient logic with the tools of modern language and logic in order to reveal both the particular nature and the universal qualities of Chinese logic. The method also explores the differences and similarities between Chinese and foreign logic. In recent years, research in Chinese logic has developed considerably; it has also logged many important achievements. But there are many different views about the complexity and long-term goals of the research. Future research will build on the merits of different kinds of logic, promote Chinese logic, and increase communication between Chinese logic and foreign logic.
|Keywords||Chinese logic meta-research methodology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Francis Bacon (2007). The New Organon. In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub.
M. J. Petry, G. W. F. Hegel, A. V. Miller & J. N. Findlay (1970). Science of Logic. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):273.
Citations of this work BETA
Jana S. Rošker (2015). Classical Chinese Logic. Philosophy Compass 10 (5):301-309.
Similar books and articles
Chung-ying Cheng (1971). Chinese Philosophy: A Characterization. Inquiry 14 (1-4):113 – 137.
Klaus Butzenberger (1993). Some General Remarks on Negation and Paradox in Chinese Logic. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20 (3):313-347.
B. Jack Copeland (2003). The Chinese Room From a Logical Point of View. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press
Chung-Ying Cheng (1975). On Implication (Tse) and Inference (Ku) in Chinese Grammar and Chinese Logic. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2 (3):225-244.
Janusz Chmielewski (2009). Language and Logic in Ancient China: Collected Papers on the Chinese Language and Logic. Pan.
Xinyan Jiang (1992). The Law of Non‐Contradiction and Chinese Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):1-14.
Jinmei Yuan (2006). The Role of Time in the Structure of Chinese Logic. Philosophy East and West 56 (1):136-152.
Weimin Sun (2009). Chinese Logic and the Absence of Theoretical Sciences in Ancient China. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #202,741 of 1,725,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,758 of 1,725,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?