David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4):383-401 (2009)
Although contemporary Confucianists tend to view Western liberalism as pitting the individual against society, recent liberal scholarship has vigorously claimed that liberal polity is indeed grounded in the self-transformation that produces “liberal virtues.” To meet this challenge, this essay presents a sophisticated Confucian critique of liberalism by arguing that there is an appreciable contrast between liberal and Confucian self-transformation and between liberal and Confucian virtues. By contrasting Locke and Confucius, key representatives of each tradition, this essay shows that both liberalism and Confucianism aim to reconstruct a society freed from antisocial passions entailing a vicious politics of resentment, and yet come to differing ethical and political resolutions. My key claim is that what makes Confucian self-cultivation so distinctive is the incorporation of ritual propriety ( li ) within it, whereas liberal self-transformation that relies heavily on a method of self-control comes back to the problem that it originally set out to overcome.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Roger T. Ames & Henry Rosemont, Jr (1999). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Ballantine.
Peter Berkowitz (2000). Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton University Press.
Sin Yee Chan (2000). Can Shu Be the One Word That Serves as the Guiding Principle of Caring Actions? Philosophy East and West 50 (4):507-524.
Sin Yee Chan (2006). The Confucian Notion of Jing (Respect). Philosophy East and West 56 (2):229 - 252.
Wing-Tsit Chan (1955). The Evolution of the Confucian Concept Jên. Philosophy East and West 4 (4):295-319.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michaelle L. Browers (2004). Arab Liberalisms: Translating Civil Society, Prioritising Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):51-75.
Jonathan Jacobs (2011). Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Alan Strudler (2008). Confucian Skepticism About Workplace Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83.
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2010). Confucian Democracy and Equality. Asian Philosophy 20 (3):261-282.
Craig L. Carr (2006). The Liberal Polity: An Inquiry Into the Logic of Civil Association. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kim Sungmoon (2009). Trouble with Korean Confucianism: Scholar-Official Between Ideal and Reality. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):29-48.
Sungmoon Kim (2010). Beyond Liberal Civil Society: Confucian Familism and Relational Strangership. Philosophy East and West 60 (4):476-498.
Hahm Chaibong (2001). Confucian Rituals and the Technology of the Self: A Foucaultian Interpretation. Philosophy East and West 51 (3):315-324.
Added to index2009-10-12
Total downloads27 ( #100,874 of 1,699,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?