The emergence of consciousness: BUC versus SOC

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):355-356 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary suggests that there are two distinct types of interacting cognitive processes. Conscious processes emerge from unconscious processes. The key problem of SOC is that it uses an overly narrow notion of the “cognitive unconscious” to show that the “cognitive unconscious” is not necessary. Yet, it has little to say about the roles of conscious and unconscious processes in general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does the SOC theory avoid unconscious rule use?Carol A. Seger - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):353-353.
The conscious and the unconscious: A package deal.Martin Kurthen - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):343-344.
Reflection and impulse as determinants of conscious and unconscious motivation.Fritz Strack & Roland Deutsch - 2005 - In Joseph P. Forgas, Kipling D. Williams & Simon M. Laham (eds.), Social Motivation: Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-112.
Trading automatic/nonautomatic for unconscious/conscious.Joseph Tzelgov - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):356-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#842,546)

6 months
1 (#1,027,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references