Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Implicit processes are thought to be relatively fast, inaccessible, holistic, and imprecise, while explicit processes are slow, accessible and precise (e.g., Reber, 1989, Sun 2002). This dichotomy is closely related to some other wellknown dichotomies including symbolic versus subsymbolic processing (Rumelhart et al., 1986), conceptual versus subconceptual processing (Smolensky, 1988), and conscious versus unconscious processing (Jacoby et al., 1994). This dichotomy has been justified by extensive studies of implicit and explicit learning, implicit and explicit memory, and implicit versus explicit metacognition (Reder, 1996).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
David C. Noelle (1999). Explicit to Whom? Accessibility, Representational Homogeneity, and Dissociable Learning Mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):777-778.
Flavia Santoianni (2011). Educational Models of Knowledge Prototypes Development. Mind and Society 10 (2):103-129.
Ron Sun, Incubation, Insight, and Creative Problem Solving: A Unified Theory and a Connectionist Model.
Christian Lebiere & Dieter Wallach (1999). Implicit and Explicit Learning in a Hybrid Architecture of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):772-773.
Arthur Markman, W. Maddox & G. C. Baldwin (2007). Using Regulatory Focus to Explore Implicit and Explicit Processing in Concept Learning. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 9-10):132-155.
Ron Sun (2005). The Interaction of the Explicit and the Implicit in Skill Learning: A Dual-Process Approach. Psychological Review 112:159-192.
Niels A. Taatgen (1999). Implicit Versus Explicit: An ACT-R Learning Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):785-786.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,556 of 740,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,452 of 740,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?