At the Intersection of Social and Cognitive Development: Internal Working Models of Attachment in Infancy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cognitive Science 34 (5):807-825 (2010)
Three visual habituation studies using abstract animations tested the claim that infants’ attachment behavior in the Strange Situation procedure corresponds to their expectations about caregiver–infant interactions. Three unique patterns of expectations were revealed. Securely attached infants expected infants to seek comfort from caregivers and expected caregivers to provide comfort. Insecure-resistant infants not only expected infants to seek comfort from caregivers but also expected caregivers to withhold comfort. Insecure-avoidant infants expected infants to avoid seeking comfort from caregivers and expected caregivers to withhold comfort. These data support Bowlby’s (1958) original claims—that infants form internal working models of attachment that are expressed in infants’ own behavior.
|Keywords||Attachment Internal working models Infant cognition Individual differences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Susan Carey (2009). The Origin of Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth James Williams Craik (1967). The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge, Cambridge U.P..
A. Woodward (1998). Infants Selectively Encode the Goal Object of an Actor's Reach. Cognition 69 (1):1-34.
György Gergely, Zoltán Nádasdy, Gergely Csibra & Szilvia Bíró (1995). Taking the Intentional Stance at 12 Months of Age. Cognition 56 (2):165-193.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Rakison (2007). Is Consciousness in its Infancy in Infancy? Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 9-10):66-89.
Josef Perner & Martin Doherty (2005). Do Infants Understand That External Goals Are Internally Represented? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):710-711.
Elizabeth S. Spelke (1985). Object Permanence in Five-Month-Old Infants. Cognition 20 (3):191-208.
Kim A. Bard, Brenda K. Todd, Chris Bernier, Jennifer Love & David A. Leavens (2006). Self-Awareness in Human and Chimpanzee Infants: What is Measured and What is Meant by the Mark and Mirror Test? Infancy 9 (2):191-219.
Scott P. Johnson (2010). How Infants Learn About the Visual World. Cognitive Science 34 (7):1158-1184.
Frank Keil (2008). Biases Towards Internal Features in Infants' Reasoning About Objects. Cognition 107 (2):420-432.
Lisbeth Nielsen (2002). The Simulation of Emotion Experience: On the Emotional Foundations of Theory of Mind. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):255-286.
Ulf Liszkowski, Penny Brown, Tara Callaghan, Akira Takada & Conny de Vos (2012). A Prelinguistic Gestural Universal of Human Communication. Cognitive Science 36 (4):698-713.
Elizabeth Meins (2004). Infants' Minds, Mothers' Minds, and Other Minds: How Individual Differences in Caregivers Affect the Co-Construction of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):116-116.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads33 ( #118,042 of 1,793,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #89,782 of 1,793,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?