David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 67 (259):5 - 18 (1992)
Women themselves, for the most part, think of themselves as the sensible sex, whose business it is to undo the harm that comes of men's impetuous follies. For my part, I distrust all generalizations about women, favourable and unfavourable, masculine and feminine, ancient and modern; all alike, I should say, result from paucity of experience.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Betty Safford (1990). Comment on Zita's Review of "The Science Question in Feminism". Hypatia 5 (1):181 - 182.
Janet A. Kourany (2010). Philosophy of Science After Feminism. Oxford University Press.
Joan B. Landes (ed.) (1998). Feminism, the Public and the Private. Oxford University Press.
Imelda Whelehan (1995). Modern Feminist Thought: From the Second Wave to "Post-Feminism". New York University Press.
Karen J. Warren (1987). Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections. Environmental Ethics 9 (1):3-20.
Lisa Weasel (2001). Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System. Hypatia 16 (1):27-44.
Jacquelyn N. Zita (1988). Review: A Review Essay. The Feminist Question of the Science Question in Feminism: A Critical Analysis of Sandra Harding's "The Science Question in Feminism". [REVIEW] Hypatia 3 (1):157 - 168.
Cassandra L. Pinnick (1994). Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 61 (4):646-657.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads62 ( #24,064 of 1,101,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #6,150 of 1,101,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?