David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hume Studies 33 (1):155-178 (2007)
It is generally assumed that in early modern Britain, chivalry—allegedly typified by the Crusades—was considered a negative or even ridiculous ideology until its rehabilitation by the pre-Romantic movement. However, this paper argues that Hume and other Scottish Enlightenment thinkers had already shown a deep interest in its historical role and influence on modern civilization. That Hume shared a broad interest in chivalry with contemporary philosophers does not undermine the novelty of his thought on this topic. In fact, the pioneering and unique aspects of his contributions can be clarified by setting them in context
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mikko Tolonen (2014). The Gothic Origin of Modern Civility: Mandeville and the Scots on Courage. Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):51-69.
Mikko Tolonen (2014). The Gothic Origin of Modern Civility: Mandeville and the Scots on Courage. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 12 (1):51-69.
David Dwan (forthcoming). Romantic Nationalism: History and Illusion in Ireland. Modern Intellectual History:1-29.
Similar books and articles
Roger L. Emerson (2008). Essays on David Hume, Medical Men, and the Scottish Enlightenment: Industry, Knowledge, and Humanity. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
M. A. Stewart (ed.) (1990). Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment. Oxford University Press.
Alexander Broadie (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Ahnert & Susan Manning (eds.) (2011). Character, Self and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment. Palgrave Macmillan.
Craig Smith (2009). The Scottish Enlightenment, Unintended Consequences and the Science of Man. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):9-28.
Takeshi Takagi (1984). A Comparison of Bushi-Do & Chivalry, 1914. Tm International Academy.
Alexander Broadie (1990). The Tradition of Scottish Philosophy: A New Perspective on the Enlightenment. Barnes & Noble.
Knud Haakonssen (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
René Moelker & Gerhard Kümmel (2007). Chivalry and Codes of Conduct: Can the Virtue of Chivalry Epitomize Guidelines for Interpersonal Conduct? Journal of Military Ethics 6 (4):292-302.
Nathaniel Wolloch (2006). The Status of Animals in Scottish Enlightenment Philosophy. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (1):63-82.
Jane Rendall (ed.) (1978). The Origins of the Scottish Enlightenment. St. Martin's Press.
Ryan Patrick Hanley (2009). Social Science and Human Flourishing: The Scottish Enlightenment and Today. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):29-46.
Robert M. Baird (1999). The Deep Spirit of the Enlightenment. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3/4):1-8.
Michael B. Gill (2010). From Cambridge Platonism to Scottish Sentimentalism. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1):13-31.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads8 ( #317,106 of 1,780,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,888 of 1,780,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?