Author's response to reviews by Catherine Wilson, Michael mascuch, and Theo Meyering
Metascience 9 (226-237):203-37 (2000)
| Abstract | Historical Cognitive Science I am lucky to strike three reviewers who extract so clearly my book's spirit as well as its substance. They all both accept and act on my central methodological assumption; that detailed historical research, and consideration of difficult contemporary questions about cognition and culture, can be mutually illuminating. It's gratifying to find many themes which recur in different contexts throughout _Philosophy and Memory_ _Traces_ so well articulated here. The reviews catch my desires to interweave discussion of cognitive theories of memory with moral questions of psychological control and self-mastery, to evoke the virtues and the pleasures of strange, baroque beliefs about fickle 'animal spirits' coursing through the nerves and the brain, to demonstrate that mechanistic explanation (even in its blunt old Cartesian form) can acknowledge complexity, and to develop scientific conceptions of dynamic memory traces and representations which can survive uncharitable philosophical criticism. The book's insistent interdisciplinarity is just an inchoate quest to acknowledge the daunting variety of the phenomena: remembering is both natural and cultural, and is studied by narrative theorists as well as neurobiologists, by physicists as well as psychologists. By fusing the rangy detail of a history of early modern neurophysiology with the committed, even gullible fervor of a defence of 'new connectionist' cognitive science, I wanted to pull out the carpet from all those who are happy to let 'scientific' and 'cultural' approaches to the mind run along independently. Once this general project is given space, as it is by all three reviewers, we can get down to specifics | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAsher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith (1998). Methodological and Substantive Implications of a Metatheoretical Distinction: More on Correspondence Versus Storehouse Metaphors of Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):165-168.
Celia Wolf-Devine (2000). Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism. [REVIEW] The Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):459-461.
Dmitri Nikulin (2008). Memory and History. Idealistic Studies 38 (1/2):75-90.
Peter R. Killeen (2005). Gradus Ad Parnassum: Ascending Strength Gradients or Descending Memory Traces? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):432-434.
John Heil (1978). Traces of Things Past. Philosophy of Science 45 (March):60-72.
John Sutton (1999). Distributed Memory, Coupling, and History. In R. Heath, B. Hayes, A. Heathcote & C. Hooker (eds.), Dynamical Cognitive Science: Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Cognitive Science Conference. University of Newcastle.
John Sutton (1998). Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,117 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
