An institutional political economy view on Thomas Nagel's 'minimum humanitarian morality' in global justice
Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3):169-178 (2012)
|Abstract||Thomas Nagel's conservative position of the political conception for world politics and his insightful ?Minimum Humanitarian Morality? (MHM) view on global justice are laudable. He admits that the path from anarchy to justice must go through injustice. But Nagel does not clearly identify the conditions under which we put up with global injustice. This paper reviews the conception of MHM through the lens of the institutional political economy. In my view, to recognize the degree of structural failure (weakness in governance) as well as the degree of transition failure (elite bargain or personalization of power being interlocked) in each state can give us a hint on how to conceptualize and apply Nagel's MHM. We also argue that the scope and degree of humanitarian aid may vary in accordance with the options to global justice open to each state|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kostas Koukouzelis (forthcoming). Liberal Internationalism and Global Social Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):97-108.
A. Walton (2009). Justice, Authority, and the World Order. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):215 – 230.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and the Cosmopolitan Political Conception of Justice. Environmental Politics 17 (4):592-609.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and Our Natural Duties of Justice. Dissertation, Uppsala University
Daniel M. Weinstock (ed.) (2007). Global Justice, Global Institutions. University of Calgary Press.
Laura Valentini (2011). Coercion and (Global) Justice. American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.
Thomas Nagel (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113–147.
Stan van Hooft (2011). Humanity or Justice? Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):291-302.
Simon Caney (2006). Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design. Social Theory and Practice 32 (4):725-756.
Simon Caney (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Carol C. Gould (2007). Coercion, Care, and Corporations: Omissions and Commissions in Thomas Pogge's Political Philosophy. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):381 – 393.
Allison B. Wolf (2005). Can Global Justice Provide a Path Toward Achieving Justice Across the Americas? Journal of Global Ethics 1 (2):153 – 176.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-13
Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?