Philosophy of Science 55 (3):387-401 (1988)
|Abstract||Fine has recently proved the surprising result that satisfaction of the Bell inequality in a Clauser-Horne experiment implies the existence of joint probabilities for pairs of noncommuting observables in the experiment. In this paper we show that if probabilities are interpreted in the von Mises-Church sense of relative frequencies on random sequences, a proof of the Bell inequality is nonetheless possible in which such joint probabilities are assumed not to exist. We also argue that Fine's theorem and related results do not impugn the common view that local realists are committed to the Bell inequality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gábor Hofer-Szabó, Bell(Δ) Inequalities Derived From Separate Common Causal Explanation of Almost Perfect Epr Anticorrelations.
Gábor Hofer-Szabó (2007). Separate- Versus Common -Common-Cause-Type Derivations of the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 163 (2):199 - 215.
Patrick Suppes & Stephan Hartmann (2010). Entanglement, Upper Probabilities and Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics. In M. Suaráz et al (ed.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Springer.
Jeremy Butterfield (1992). Bell's Theorem: What It Takes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):41-83.
Thomas Müller & Tomasz Placek (2001). Against a Minimalist Reading of Bell's Theorem: Lessons From Fine. Synthese 128 (3):343 - 379.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,010 of 548,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?