David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):93-118 (2003)
This article considers the difficult question of whether there are any reasons for theocratic religious devotees to affirm liberalism and liberal institutions. Swaine argues not only that there are reasons for theocrats to affirm liberalism, but that theocrats are committed rationally to three normative principles of liberty of conscience, as well. Swaine subsequently discusses three institutional and strategic implications of his arguments. First, he outlines an option of semisovereignty for theocratic communities in liberal democracies, and explains why an appropriate valuation of liberty of conscience may justify a standard of that kind. Second, he addresses the question of permissible government aid for religion and symbolic endorsement of religious groups. Third, Swaine considers innovations and new approaches that could be employed internationally to better display liberal government's affirmation of religiosity, to promote liberty of conscience, and to help improve relations between liberal and theocratic parties around the globe.
|Keywords||freedom liberalism liberty of conscience pluralism politics religion semisovereignty theocracy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lucas Swaine (2005). Political Theory and the Conduct of Faith: Oakeshott on Religion in Public Life. Contemporary Political Theory 4 (1):63.
Lucas Swaine (2005). Political Theory and the Conduct of Faith: Oakeshott on Religion in Public Life. Contemporary Political Theory 4 (1):63-82.
F. M. Frohock (2006). An Alternative Model of Political Reasoning. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (1):27 - 64.
Andrew K. Wahlstrom (2005). Liberal Democracies and Encompassing Religious Communities: A Defense of Autonomy and Accommodation. Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (1):31–48.
Lucas Swaine (2007). The Battle for Liberalism: Facing the Challenge of Theocracy. Critical Review 19 (4):565-575.
Similar books and articles
John Tomasi (2011). Liberal Theocracy and the Justificatory Dance. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):517-520.
Bryan Garsten (2011). Liberalism's Bad Conscience. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):509-512.
Lucas Swaine (2011). The Liberal Conscience: An Overview. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):505-507.
Allyn Fives (2007). Lucas Swaine, the Liberal Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):515-517.
Patrick Neal (2011). Liberals and Theocrats: On Lucas Swaine'sThe Liberal Conscience. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):513-516.
Lucas Swaine (2011). The Ascendant Liberal Conscience: A Response to Three Critics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):521-529.
Lucas Swaine (2010). Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic Virtue and the Chains of Autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):73-93.
Lucas A. Swaine (2001). How Ought Liberal Democracies to Treat Theocratic Communities? Ethics 111 (2):302-343.
Aaron Lercher (2006). Liberty of Ecological Conscience. Environmental Ethics 28 (3):315-322.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #261,893 of 1,938,440 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #208,303 of 1,938,440 )
How can I increase my downloads?