David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 64 (1):69 - 92 (1985)
Some time ago, F. P. Ramsey (1960) suggested that knowledge is true belief obtained by a reliable process. This suggestion has only recently begun to attract serious attention. In 'Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge', Alvin Goldman (1976) argues that a person has knowl- edge only if that person's belief has been formed as a result of a reliable cognitive mechanism. In Belief, Truth, and Knowledge, David Arm- strong (1973) argues that one has knowledge only if one's belief is a comPletely reliable sign of the truth of the proposition believed. On both of these theories, the reliability of one's belief is a necessary condition of that belief's being an instance of knowledge. These reliability theories have another interesting feature in common, namely, that neither of them explicitly requires or includes the traditional justification requirement for knowledge. Reliability has taken over the role of justification. This naturally leads to the question whether reliability and justification are related in some philosophically interes- ting fashion. In this paper I shall investigate this question. The result will be a positive proposal to the effect that justified belief is reliable belief. This result, in turn, explains why reliability can take over the role of justification in an account of knowledge. Moreover, the identification of justification with reliability constitutes a step toward the naturalization of normative epistemological concepts.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
D. M. Armstrong (1973). Belief, Truth and Knowledge. London,Cambridge University Press.
Alvin Goldman (1979). ``What is Justified Belief?&Quot. In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. 1-25.
Henry E. Kyburg Jr (1961). Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press.
Frederick F. Schmitt (1981). Justification as Reliable Indication or Reliable Process? Philosophical Studies 40 (3):409 - 417.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Silva (2013). How To Be Conservative: A Partial Defense of Epistemic Conservatism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):501-514.
D. E. Over (1987). Russell's Hierarchy of Acquaintance. Philosophical Papers 16 (2):107-124.
Similar books and articles
T. Shogenji (2000). Self-Dependent Justification Without Circularity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):287-298.
Campbell Brown (2012). The Utility of Knowledge. Erkenntnis 77 (2):155-65.
Frederick F. Schmitt (1983). Knowledge, Justification, and Reliability. Synthese 55 (2):209 - 229.
William Harper (1998). Papier Mâché Problems in Epistemology: A Defense of Strong Internalism. Synthese 116 (1):27-49.
Michael A. Bishop (2010). Why the Generality Problem is Everybody's Problem. Philosophical Studies 151 (2):285 - 298.
Jonathan Kvanvig (1986). How to Be a Reliabilist. American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (2):189 - 198.
Jarrett Leplin (2007). In Defense of Reliabilism. Philosophical Studies 134 (1):31 - 42.
Alvin Goldman, Reliabilism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robert Audi (2009). Reliability as a Virtue. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #34,903 of 1,089,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #42,773 of 1,089,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?