On the Kemeny-Oppenheim treatment of reduction
Philosophical Studies 13 (6):94-96 (1962)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Emergence Reduction Science Kemeny, J Nagel, E Oppenheim, P | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesColin Klein (2009). Reduction Without Reductionism: A Defence of Nagel on Connectability. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):39 - 53.
Raphael van Riel (2011). Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel Model. Philosophy of Science 78 (3):353-375.
Steven Orla Kimbrough (1979). On the Reduction of Genetics to Molecular Biology. Philosophy of Science 46 (3):389-406.
Helmut F. Spinner (1973). Science Without Reduction. Inquiry 16 (1-4):16 – 94.
John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim (1952). Degree of Factual Support. Philosophy of Science 19 (4):307-324.
R. E. Tully (1976). Reduction and Secondary Qualities. Mind 85 (July):351-370.
John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim (1955). Systematic Power. Philosophy of Science 22 (1):27-33.
Kenneth F. Schaffner (1967). Approaches to Reduction. Philosophy of Science 34 (2):137-147.
John G. Kemeny & Paul Oppenheim (1956). On Reduction. Philosophical Studies 7 (1-2):6 - 19.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,161 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
