David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):521-529 (2011)
A liberalism of conscience incorporates both persuasion and reasoning to achieve its ends, but it does not entail guilt or bad conscience about the need to rule. Neither does the approach involve efforts to convert dissenters to some specific conception of the good. My view differs significantly from the views of John Rawls and John Locke: a liberalism of conscience is based in principles that people should accept, and which provide a firmer ground for rightful toleration. The theory is critical for rethinking the nature of value-pluralism, and it is capable of uniting religious and secular parties in an affirmation of fundamental political principles
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Locke (2013). A Letter Concerning Toleration. Broadview Press.
John Locke (2007). Second Treatise on Government. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd..
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Joseph Raz (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
L. Swaine (2009). Deliberate and Free: Heteronomy in the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (1-2):183-213.
Citations of this work BETA
Lucas Swaine (2013). Moral Character for Political Leaders: A Normative Account. Res Publica 19 (4):317-333.
Similar books and articles
Lucas A. Swaine (2003). Institutions of Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1):93-118.
Bryan Garsten (2011). Liberalism's Bad Conscience. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):509-512.
Lucas Swaine (2011). The Liberal Conscience: An Overview. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):505-507.
John Tomasi (2011). Liberal Theocracy and the Justificatory Dance. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):517-520.
Edward Andrew & Peter Lindsay (2008). Are the Judgments of Conscience Unreasonable? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):235-254.
Lucas Swaine (2010). Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic Virtue and the Chains of Autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):73-93.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39 (1).
Christopher J. Eberle (2006). Lucas Swaine, The Liberal Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism:The Liberal Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism. Ethics 116 (4):813-819.
David Bosco (1986). Conscience As Court And Worm: Calvin And The Three Elements Of Conscience. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):333-355.
Jeff Spinner-Halev (2005). Hinduism, Christianity, and Liberal Religious Toleration. Political Theory 33 (1):28 - 57.
Irit Samet (2012). What Conscience Can Do for Equity. Jurisprudence 3 (1):13-35.
Ronald Ledek (1996). The Nature of Conscience and its Religious Significance with a Special Reference to John Henry Newman. International Scholars Publications.
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Allyn Fives (2007). Lucas Swaine, the Liberal Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious Pluralism. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5):515-517.
Added to index2011-08-26
Total downloads5 ( #241,807 of 1,140,133 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #147,976 of 1,140,133 )
How can I increase my downloads?