In Journal of Markets and Morality (2003)
|Abstract||The distinction between negative and positive liberty is familiar to political philosophers. The negative variety is freedom as noninterference. The positive variety is freedom as self-mastery. However, recently there has been an attempt on the part of a growing number of philosophers, historians, and legal scholars to recapture a third concept of political liberty uncovered from within the rich tradition of civic republicanism. Republican political liberty is freedom as nondomination. I argue that features that distinguish it from noninterference and self-mastery highlight the theoretical and practical advantages of liberty as nondomination. It is, among these candidates, best-suited to serve as the guiding principle for the State's basic institutions and rules. The principle says that the State should secure nondomination among its citizens.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matt Zwolinski (2009). Liberty. In John Shand (ed.), Central Issues in Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Preston King (2000). Liberty: All Coherence Gone? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):25-48.
Lawrence Crocker (1980). Positive Liberty: An Essay in Normative Political Philosophy. Distributor, Kluwer Boston.
John Christman (2005). Saving Positive Freedom. Political Theory 33 (1):79 - 88.
Gerald Lang (2012). Invigilating Republican Liberty. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):273-293.
Philip Pettit (2002). Keeping Republican Freedom Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner. Political Theory 30 (3):339-356.
Eric Nelson (2005). Liberty: One Concept Too Many? Political Theory 33 (1):58 - 78.
Christian Nadeau (2003). Non-Domination as a Moral Ideal. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):120-134.
Added to index2009-02-10
Total downloads59 ( #16,439 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?