David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1990)
This book offers a new approach to the analysis of the multiple meanings of English modals, conjunctions, conditionals, and perception verbs. Although such ambiguities cannot easily be accounted for by feature-analyses of word meaning, Eve Sweetser's argument shows that they can be analyzed both readily and systematically. Meaning relationships in general cannot be understood independently of human cognitive structure, including the metaphorical and cultural aspects of that structure. Sweetser shows that both lexical polysemy and pragmatic ambiguity are shaped by our metaphorical folk understanding of epistemic processes and of speech interaction. Similar regularities can be shown to structure the contrast among root, epistemic and speech act uses of modal verbs, multiple uses of conjunctions and conditionals, and certain processes of historical change observed in Indo-European languages. Since polysemy is typically the intermediate step in semantic change, the same regularities observable in polysemy can be extended to an analysis of semantic change.
|Keywords||Semantics Grammar, Comparative and general Modality (Linguistics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.97 used (65% off) $33.00 new (43% off) $57.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||P325.S96 1990|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rafael E. Núñez & Eve Sweetser (2006). With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30 (3):401-450.
Matthew Chrisman (2012). 'Ought' and Control. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):433-451.
Guy Politzer (2007). Reasoning with Conditionals. Topoi 26 (1):79-95.
Felipe S. Amaral (2008). Definite Descriptions Are Ambiguous. Analysis 68 (300):288-297.
Muffy E. A. Siegel (2006). Biscuit Conditionals: Quantification Over Potential Literal Acts. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (2):167 - 203.
Similar books and articles
Tim Hunter (2011). Syntactic Effects of Conjunctivist Semantics: Unifying Movement and Adjunction. John Benjamins Pub. Company.
Yael Ravin (1990). Lexical Semantics Without Thematic Roles. Oxford University Press.
Marina Rakova (2003). The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and the Theories of Concepts. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jean-Pierre Koenig & Anthony R. Davis (2001). Sublexical Modality and the Structure of Lexical Semantic Representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (1):71-124.
Steven Cushing (1982). Quantifier Meanings: A Study in the Dimensions of Semantic Competence. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Nicholas Evans (1998). The Knowing Ear: An Australian Test of Universal Claims About the Semantic Structure of Sensory Verbs and Their Extension Into the Domain of Cognition. Institut Für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Zu Köln.
Anna Papafragou (1998). The Acquisition of Modality: Implications for Theories of Semantic Representation. Mind and Language 13 (3):370–399.
Elizabeth Closs Traugott (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press.
Karl Friedrich Wender (1984). On Semantic Decomposition of Verbs. Institute of Psychology of the University of Technology.
J. E. Miller (1985). Semantics and Syntax: Parallels and Connections. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads94 ( #47,274 of 2,072,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #83,955 of 2,072,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?