David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):435-464 (2006)
Continuing advances in human ability to manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular levels (i.e. nanoscale science and engineering) offer many previously unimagined possibilities for scientific discovery and technological development. Paralleling these advances in the various science and engineering subdisciplines is the increasing realization that a number of associated social, ethical, environmental, economic and legal dimensions also need to be explored. An important component of such exploration entails the identification and analysis of the ways in which current and prospective researchers in these fields conceptualize these dimensions of their work. Within the context of a National Science Foundation funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program in nanomaterials processing and characterization at the University of Central Florida (2002–2004), here I present for discussion (i) details of a “nanotechnology ethics” seminar series developed specifically for students participating in the program, and (ii) an analysis of students’ and participating research faculty’s perspectives concerning social and ethical issues associated with nanotechnology research. I conclude with a brief discussion of implications presented by these issues for general scientific literacy and public science education policy.
|Keywords||nanotechnology nanoscale science engineering biotechnology ethics researcher beliefs science education|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen H. Cutcliffe, Christine M. Pense & Michael Zvalaren (2012). Framing the Discussion: Nanotechnology and the Social Construction of Technology--What STS Scholars Are Saying. NanoEthics 6 (2):81-99.
Gina M. Eosco, Meghnaa Tallapragada, Katherine A. McComas & Merrill Brady (2014). Exploring Societal and Ethical Views of Nanotechnology REUs. NanoEthics 8 (1):91-99.
Similar books and articles
Göran Hermerén (2007). Challenges in the Evaluation of Nanoscale Research: Ethical Aspects. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (3):223-237.
Rinie van Est (2011). The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Rinie Est (2011). The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Michael Lightner & Erik Fisher (2011). Entering the Social Experiment: A Case for the Informed Consent of Graduate Engineering Students. Social Epistemology 23 (3):283-300.
Jason Borenstein (2011). Responsible Authorship in Engineering Fields: An Overview of Current Ethical Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):355-364.
John Ziman (2001). Getting Scientists to Think About What They Are Doing. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):165-176.
Rosalyn W. Berne (2004). Towards the Conscientious Development of Ethical Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):627-638.
Joachim Schummer (2004). Interdisciplinary Issues in Nanoscale Research. In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios 9--20.
Haldun M. Ozaktas (2013). Teaching Science, Technology, and Society to Engineering Students: A Sixteen Year Journey. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1439-1450.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #338,493 of 1,699,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?