Arguments for the Existence of God IN Key Themes in Philosophy

In . Cambridge Univ Pr (1989)
Abstract In an inductive argument data increase the probability of a hypothesis insofar as the hypothesis makes probable the data, the data are otherwise not likely to occur, and the hypothesis is simple. The Cosmological argument from the existence of the universe, the Teleological argument from its conformity to natural law, and other arguments from more detailed features of the universe each increase the probability that there is a God. I thus summarize in simple form the main points of my book ’The Existence of God’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,875
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Configure

Similar books and articles
R. G. Swinburne (1984). Arguments for the Existence of God. In J. Houston (ed.), Is It Reasonable to Believe in God? Handsel Press.
Laura L. Garcia (2010). Teleological and Design Arguments. In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Second Edition). Wiley Blackwell.
Richard Swinburne (2000). Reply to Grünbaum. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):481 - 485.
W. Jay Wood (2011). God. Mcgill-Queen’s Univ Pr.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2011-04-12

Total downloads

0

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums